2011ǯ08·î30Æü
̱¼ç¼çµÁÂÐÃæ¹ñ2
¤½¤¦¤·¤¿¹ñ²È¤Ç¡¢·ÐºÑ¤¬À®¸ù¤·¤ÆÍ褿¥±¡¼¥¹¤Ïº£¤Þ¤Ç̵¤¤¡£¤¿¤Àµ¤¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¤Î¤ÏºòÆü¤Î¥Õ¥§¡¼¥¹¥Ö¥Ã¥¯¤Ç¤ÎÎëÌÚ¤µ¤ó¤äÌøÂô¤µ¤ó¤Î¥³¥á¥ó¥È¤Ë¤â¤¢¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢ûý¾®Ê¿¤Î»þÂ夫¤é30ǯ°Ê¾å¤¬·Ð²á¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤Ç¡¢´ë¶È¤ËÅö¤Æ¤Ï¤á¤ë¤È¡¢´û¤Ë¼÷Ì¿¤¬²á¤®¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£¤·¤«¤·¤Ê¤¬ ¤é¡¢¤½¤Î¼÷Ì¿¤ò±ä¤Ð¤¹¤«¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢ÉϤ·¤¤¹ñ²È¤Î³Ì¤òÇˤꡢ³Î¤«¤ËÈà¤é¤Ï90ǯÂå¤Ë³×Ì¿¤ËɤŨ¤¹¤ë¤è¤¦¤ÊÂç²þ³×¤ò¤·¤Æ¹ñ¤ò³«¤¤¤ÆÍ褿¡£¤½¤ÎÉôʬ¤ò¤³¤ÎÃø¼Ô¤Ï¸«È´¤¤¤Æ¤¤¤Ê¤¤¡£¤Ç¤Ïº£Æü¤â»Ï¤á¤è¤¦¡£
The combination of smooth political succession and strong economic growth helps explain why China is more stable than the USSR was at a similar level of development. In 1990, just before its collapse/democratic transition, the USSR had a PPP-adjusted per-capita GDP of just under $7,000 (in 1990 Geary-Khamis international dollars), according to Angus Maddison, whose research everybody seems to use on this. Mr Maddison put China at $4,800 (same units) in 2003; since then its economy has grown by 8-10% a year, suggesting it's now richer than the USSR ever was. Having spent a few months in the USSR in 1990, I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case. (Though Chinese PPP conversions are controversial. IMF and World Bank figures put Chinese incomes lower than Mr Maddison's.
±ß³ê¤ÊÀ¯¼£¤Î·Ñ¾µ¤È¶¯ÎϤʷкÑÀ®Ä¹¤Î·ë¹ç¤ÏȯŸ¤¬»÷¤¿¤è¤¦¤Ê¥ì¥Ù¥ë¤ÎUSSR¤è¤ê¤â¤Ê¤¼Ãæ¹ñ¤¬°ÂÄꤷ¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤«¤òÀâÌÀ¤¹¤ë¾å¤Ç¤Î¼ê½õ¤±¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¡£Angus Maddison¤Ë¤è¤ë¤È¡¢1990ǯ¤ËÃúÅÙ¡¢Êø²õ¡¿Ì±¼ç¼çµÁ¤Ø¤Î°Ü¹Ô¤ÎÁ°¤Ë¡¤USSR¤ÏÃúÅÙ7,000¥É¥ë°Ê²¼¤Î¹ØÇãÎÏÊ¿²Á¤ÇÄ´À°¤·¤¿°ì¿ÍÅö¤¿¤ê¤ÎGDP¡Ê1990ǯ¤Ç¤Ï¹ñºÝ¥²¥¢¥ê¡¼¡á¥±¥¤¥ß¥¹ ¥É¥ë¡Ë¤Ç¤¢¤Ã¤¿¡£¤³¤ÎÁÈ¿¥¤ÎÄ´ºº¤ò¤³¤Î¤³¤È¤Çï¤â¤¬»È¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤è¤¦¤À¡£Maddison»á¤ÏÃæ¹ñ¤ò2003ǯ¤Ë¡ÊƱ°ìñ°Ì¤Ç¡Ë4,800¥É¥ë¤È¤·¤¿¡£¡¨¤½¤ì°ÊÍè¡¢¤½¤³¤Î·ÐºÑ¤Ï°ìǯ¤Ç¡¢8-10%À®Ä¹¤·¤ÆÍè¤Æ¤¤¤Æ¡¢¤«¤Ã¤Æ¤ÎUSSR¤è¤ê¤âº£¤Ïˤ«¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¼¨¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£1990ǯ¤ËUSSR¤Ç ¿ô¥ö·î²á¤·¤ÆÍ褿¤¬¡¢¤³¤Î¤³¤È¤¬¼Â¾ð¤Ç¤¢¤Ã¤¿¤È¤·¤Æ¤â»ä¤Ï¶Ã¤«¤Ê¤¤¤À¤í¤¦¡£¡ÊÃæ¹ñ¿Í¤ÎPPPÊÑ´¹¤Ï°ÛÏÀ¤¬Â¿¤¤¤±¤ì¤É¤â¡£IMF¤äÀ¤³¦¶ä¹Ô¤Î¿ô»ú¤Ï Maddison»á¤è¤ê¤âÃæ¹ñ¿Í¤Î½êÆÀ¤òÄ㤯¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£¡Ë
¹ñºÝ¥²¥¢¥ê¡¼¡á¥±¥¤¥ß¥¹¡ÊGeary-Khamis¡Ë¥É¥ë¡§³Æ¹ñÄ̲ߤò¹ØÇãÎÏÊ¿²Á¤Ç´¹»»¤·¤¿¤â¤Î¤Ç¡¢1990ǯ´ð½à¤Î¼Â¼ÁÃͤǤ¢¤ë¡£¤Ê¤ª¡¢¤³¤Î¥Ç¡¼¥¿¤Ï¡¢¤½¤ì¤¾¤ì¤Î»þÂå¤ÎÎÎÅڤǤϤʤ¯¡¢¸½ºß¤ÎÎÎÅÚ¤¬´ð½à¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£
But others warn the IMF/WB figures are based on 2005 price surveys that were too high, which would mean current Chinese per capita GDP is 21% of America's, and China will become the world's largest economy in 2012, not 2016 as the IMF estimates. This ADB paper suggests China is now as rich as the USSR was even as a percentage of contemporaneous US per-capita income, but it puts that figure at almost 30%, which seems absurdly high.) Anyway, China appears to be hitting income levels where other countries have experienced democratic transitions without any sign of a plausible challenge to CPC rule.
¤·¤«¤·¡¢Â¾¤Î¿Í¤¿¤Á¤¬·Ù¹ð¤·¤¿¤Î¤Ï IMF/WB¤Î¿ô»ú¤Ï2005ǯ¤Îʪ²ÁÄ´ºº¤Ë´ð¤Å¤¤¤Æ¤¤¤Æ¡¢¤½¤ì¤Ï¤¢¤Þ¤ê¤Ë¹â¤«¤Ã¤¿¤Î¤Ç¡¢¤½¤ì¤ÏÃæ¹ñ¤Î°ì¿ÍÅö¤¿¤ê¤ÎGDP¤Ï¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Î21% ¤Ë¤Ê¤ê¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¡¢Ãæ¹ñ¤ÏIMF¤¬Í½ÁÛ¤·¤¿2016ǯ¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢2012ǯ¤Ë¤ÏÀ¤³¦ºÇÂç¤Î·ÐºÑ¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¤À¤í¤¦¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È°ÕÌ£¤¹¤ë¡£¤³¤Î¥¢¥¸¥¢³«È¯¶ä¹Ô¤ÎÊó¹ð½ñ¤Ç¤Ïº£¤äÃæ¹ñ¤ÏUSSR¤ÈƱ¤¸¤è¤¦¤Ëˤ«¤À¤È¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤Æ¡¢¤½¤ÎUSSR¤ÏƱ»þ´ü¤Î¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤Î°ì¿ÍÅö¤¿¤ê¤Î½êÆÀ¤Î³ä¹ç¡¢¤½¤ì¤Ï¤½¤Î¿ô»ú¤¬¤â¤¦¾¯¤·¤Ç30%¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¤¬¡¢¥Ð¥«¤ß¤¿¤¤¤Ë¹â¤¤¤è¤¦¤À¤¬¡¢¤½¤Î³ä¹ç¤Î¹â¤µ¤Ç¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤ò¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£¤È¤Ë¤«¤¯¡¢Ãæ¹ñ¤¬Ãæ¹ñ¶¦»ºÅÞ»ÙÇۤؤΤâ¤Ã¤È¤â¤é¤·¤¤Ä©Àï¤Î²¿¤é¤ÎÃû¸õ¤â¤Ê¤·¤Ë¡¢Â¾¤Î¹ñ¡¹¤¬Ì±¼ç¼çµÁ¤Ø¤Î°Ü¹Ô¤ò·Ð¸³¤·¤ÆÍ褿½êÆÀ¿å½à¤Ë㤷¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤è¤¦¤À¡£
CPC Communist Party of China: Ãæ¹ñ¶¦»ºÅÞ
Why would that be? Political scientists looking at the relative stability of different autocracies break the category up into subgroups with varying characteristics. For example, a recent paper by Krister Lundell, delivered at what sounds like a truly awesome panel in February in Sao Paulo (¡ÈBad Guys, Good Governance? Varieties of Capitalism in Autocracies¡É), runs through a bunch of different categorisation schemes in trying to sort out what characteristics might distinguish autocracies that go democratic (or "hybrid", ie part of the way towards democracy) from those that remain permanent autocracies. He doesn't come up with much. Income levels, interestingly, don't seem to be that important. The oil-exporting factor is important, as my colleague mentions. Islamic countries are more likely to stay autocratic, but that's confounded by the oil-export factor so it's not clear how important it is.
¤Ê¤¼¤½¤¦¤Ê¤Î¤À¤í¤¦¤«¡©¡¡°Û¤Ê¤Ã¤¿ÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤ÈÈæ³Ó¤·¤Æ°ÂÄꤷ¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤ò¸«¤ÆÍ褿À¯¼£²Ê³Ø¼Ôã¤Ï°Û¤Ê¤ëÆÃħ¤´¤È¤Ë¾®Ê¬Îà¤Ë¤½¤Î¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼¤òʬ³ä¤·¤¿¡£Î㤨¤Ð¡¢Krister Lundell¤Ë¤è¤ëºÇ¶á¤ÎÊó¹ð½ñ¤Ï¥µ¥ó¥Ñ¥¦¥í¤Ç¡¢2·î¤ËËÜÅö¤ËºÇ¹â¤Î¥Ñ¥Í¥ë¥Ç¥£¥¹¥«¥Ã¥·¥ç¥ó¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê¤È¤³¤í¤ËÁ÷ÉÕ¤µ¤ì¤¿¤¬¡¢¡Ê¡Ö°¤¤Åۤ顣Îɤ¤Åý¼£¡©ÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤Ë±÷¤±¤ë¿ÍͤʻñËܼçµÁ¡Ë¤½¤ì¤Ï¤¢¤Á¤³¤Á¤Î¿¤¯¤ÎʬÎàÂηϤòÁö¤ê²ó¤ê¡¢¤É¤ó¤ÊÆÃħ¤¬¡¢±Ê³¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ëÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤Ëα¤Þ¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤â¤Î¤«¤é̱¼ç¼çµÁ¡Ê¤â¤·¤¯ ¤Ï¡Öº®¹ç·¿¡×¤¹¤Ê¤ï¤Á¡¢¤ä¤êÊý¤Î°ìÉô¤¬Ì±¼ç¼çµÁ¤ÎÊý¸þ¤Ë¸þ¤«¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡Ë¤Ë¤Ê¤ëÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤ò¼±Ê̤¹¤ë¤«¤òÁª¤Ó½Ð¤½¤¦¤È¤·¤¿¡£Èà¤Ï¤¢¤Þ¤ê¸«¤Ä¤±¤ë¤³¤È¤¬½ÐÍè¤Ê ¤«¤Ã¤¿¡£½êÆÀ¿å½à¤Ï¡¢ÌÌÇò¤¤¤³¤È¤Ë¡¢¤½¤ì¤Û¤É½ÅÍפǤϤʤ«¤Ã¤¿¡£»ä¤ÎƱν¤¬¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ë¡¢ÀÐÌýÍ¢½ÐÍ×°ø¤Ï½ÅÍפÀ¡£¥¤¥¹¥é¥à½ô¹ñ¤ÏÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤Ëα¤Þ¤ë¤Î¤¬¤è¤ê¤Õ¤µ¤ï¤·¤¤¤è ¤¦¤À¤¬¡¢¤½¤ì¤ÏÀÐÌýÍ¢½ÐÍ×°ø¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ¸ÍÏǤäƤ¤¤ë¡£¤À¤«¤é¡¢¤½¤ì¤¬¤É¤ì¤Û¤É½ÅÍפʤΤ«¤Ï¤Ã¤¤ê¤·¤Ê¤¤¡£
º£Æü¤Ï¤³¤ì¤Þ¤Ç¤À¤¬¡¢³Î¤«¤ËÃæÅì¤Ï¥È¥ë¥³¤ò½ü¤¤¤ÆÆÈºÛ¹ñ²È¤À¤¬¡¢¤½¤ì¤¬ÀÐÌýÍ¢½ÐÍ×°ø¤¬±Æ¶Á¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤«¤â¤·¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤È¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤¬¡¢¤½¤ì¤Ïµ¿¤ï¤·¤¤¡£ÃæÅì¤ÈÃæ¹ñ¤Ï̱¼ç²½±¿Æ°¤¬¤¢¤ë¤è¤¦¤À¤¬¡¢¿Ê¹Ô¤Ï¤·¤Ê¤¤¡£¤½¤â¤½¤âÎò»ËŪ¤Ë¤Ê¤¸¤Þ¤Ê¤¤¤È»×¤¦¡£Ãæ¹ñ¤â»ñËܼçµÁ²½¤¬¿Ê¹Ô¤·¤¿¤Î¤Ïûý¾®Ê¿¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤«¤é¤Ç¡¢Èब°ìµ¤¤ËÃæ¹ñ¤ò»Ô¾ì·ÐºÑ²½¤·¤Æ¹Ô¤Ã¤¿¡£°ìÅÞÆÈºÛ¤Ï¤½¤Î»ØÆ³¼Ô¤Ë¹ñ²È¤ÎÊý¸þÀ¤ò°Ñ¤Í¤ë¤Î¤Ç¡¢¤½¤Î·ë²Ì¤Ï̱¼ç¼çµÁ¹ñ²È¤è¤ê¤â°Õ»×·èÄ꤬Áᤤ¤«¤é¡¢¸²Ãø¤À¡£ºòº£¤ÎÎã¤Ç¤Ï¿·¥¨¥Í¥ë¥®¡¼¤¬¸À¤¨¤ë¡£Ãæ¹ñ¤¬¥¢¥á¥ê¥«¤òÈ´¤¤¤Æ¡¢À¤³¦°ì¤À¤¬¡¢¤½¤ì¤ÏµÄ²ñ¤¬Ìµ¤¤¤«¤é¤Ç¡¢°Õ»×·èÄ꤬ÂçÅýÎΤè¤ê¤âÍÚ¤«¤ËÁᤤ¡£Â¿Ê¬¤³¤ÎÃø¼Ô¤ÏÃæ¹ñ¤ÎÎò»Ë¤òÊÙ¶¯¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Ê¤¤¤Î¤Ç¡¢²áµî¤Î·Ð°Þ¦¤«¤é¤Ê¤Î¤Ç¤³¤¦¸À¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤À¤í¤¦¤«¡£ÃæÅì¤âƱ¤¸¤À¡£¥«¥ë¥¿¥´¡¢¥í¡¼¥ÞÄë¹ñ¡¢Åì¥í¡¼¥ÞÄë¹ñ¡¢¥ª¥¹¥Þ¥óÄë¹ñ¤ÎÎò»Ë¤ÏÃæ¹ñ¤ÈƱÍͤΰìÅÞÆÈºÛ¤Î¹ÄÄë¤À¤Ã¤¿¡£º£Æü¤Ï¤³¤ì¤Þ¤Ç¡£